Capital gains taxes affect new business startups
The Hill | When Americans think of “capital gains taxes” they often mistakenly think about the big guys—Wall Street and power players—and neglect the impact on the “little guy” entrepreneurs who are so vital to our economy.
The taxation of capital gains has become a perennial issue in tax policy, but the lame-duck Congressional session has put the topic front-and-center. As with any such conversation, having more facts and insights is crucial to sound policymaking. Unfortunately, there is a significant “knowledge gap.” Even though there is a great deal of chatter relating to the issue of large corporations and capital gains, not discussed sufficiently in the overall effects of capital gains taxation is how these taxes affect entrepreneurs. While many analyses focus on the disincentive effects created by capital gains taxes for investors in large corporations, these disincentives may be even more important for entrepreneurs.
Working with the American Council on Capital Formation I set out to document the potential importance of capital gains taxation on entrepreneurs, household portfolios, the composition of unrealized capital gains held by households, and whether capital gains taxes are related to disbursements by venture capital partnerships are analyzed. Herein are our findings:
First, active business assets – the types of assets that are likely to be associated with capital gains for entrepreneurs – play an important role in the aggregate portfolio of household assets. According to the 2007 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) from the Federal Reserve Board, 11.1 percent of households hold active business assets, and these assets account for 19 percent of household portfolios; by comparison, stocks held directly or in mutual funds (but outside of retirement accounts) are only 11.7 percent of household wealth.
Second, the stock of unrealized capital gains associated with privately held businesses is large. The SCF data suggest that aggregate unrealized capital gains on active business assets are almost six times larger than aggregate unrealized capital gains on corporate stock. The magnitude of unrealized capital gains on active business assets suggests that capital gains tax rates could play an important role in whether and when these assets are sold and also that the capital gains tax could distort a number of important decisions of entrepreneurs.
These decisions include starting a new business, expanding the business, and obtaining outside financing; the capital gains tax can also affect whether and when an entrepreneur sells his or her business. The possibility that the capital gains tax is asymmetric with respect to gains and losses, with gains being taxed more heavily than losses, magnifies the importance of these distortions.
Third, the impact of capital gains tax rates on the disbursements of venture capital funds is analyzed using state-aggregate data from 1969-2007. Regression analysis suggests that higher capital gains tax rates are associated with a reduction in state-level disbursements from venture capital funds. Since many of the sources of venture capital funding are not subject to capital gains taxation, this finding suggests a demand side effect: in states with higher capital gains tax rates, fewer entrepreneurs are starting businesses that seek venture capital funding.
In the coming days our nation’s leaders will make big decisions that will have a direct bearing on the trajectory of tax policy and small business growth. When it comes to capital gains tax rates, they must focus less on the Wall Street big guys and more on the Main Street little guys, whose risk taking is critical if we are to recover from the economic slump.
William Gentry is a professor of economics at Williams College and a member of the Board of Scholars of the American Council for Capital Formation’s Center for Policy Research