Federal Debt, AI and a Warning for Future US Investment and Economic Security

The Well News

The United States is approaching an inflection point, one defined not by a single crisis, but by the confluence of several slowly building threats to its long-term economic and national security. These threats include the growing federal debt that threatens the market for U.S. Treasurys, transformative artificial intelligence technologies and uncertain economic growth.

With the One Big Beautiful Bill Act now law, it is prudent to consider that the U.S. national debt now exceeds $36 trillion, with annual deficits projected to remain above $1.5 trillion in the foreseeable future. However, demand for U.S. Treasurys, which has historically fueled this fiscal expansion, is exhibiting signs of declining interest. Foreign buyers are gradually reducing their holdings. Domestic institutions are becoming more discerning, and as real yields increase, investors anticipate that higher risk premiums will be required to sustain the financing of the U.S. government’s borrowing needs.

The consequences are significant. As investors begin to avoid Treasurys or require higher returns, interest rates will rise. This will not only escalate debt servicing costs, potentially crowding out essential expenditures on defense, infrastructure and innovation, but also dampen business investment and consumer borrowing.

Concurrently, the U.S. economy is facing a structural transformation driven by AI. While AI promises substantial long-term benefits enhancing productivity, innovation and economic growth, it is also a disruptive force. In that regard, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, one of the world’s most powerful creators of AI, has issued a warning for the U.S. government and everyone, captured in a recent Axios article. Over the next five years, millions of jobs in white-collar professions may be altered or eliminated, leading to significant labor market shifts.

Despite AI benefits, in such an environment, economic growth could slow, even as public spending on entitlement programs and interest payments continue to rise. Stagflation may result, exacerbating economic and social concerns, and even threatening national security.

Rising interest obligations will limit the federal government’s flexibility to respond to global crises. A reduced ability to fund defense modernization or critical research and development could erode the U.S. strategic edge in space, cyber and AI-enabled warfare, areas where rivals like China are investing heavily.

Moreover, the weaponization of debt markets by foreign powers, or the growing use of alternative payment systems that bypass the U.S. dollar’s reserve currency status, threaten to undermine the geopolitical influence that the dollar has long provided. A weakened economic foundation makes America more susceptible to coercion, less capable of deterrence, and slower to lead coalitions in an increasingly multipolar world.

These emerging realities demand a clear-eyed, bipartisan response. First, the U.S. must restore fiscal discipline by realigning spending with long-term national priorities. Interest payments cannot be allowed to crowd-out investments in defense, technology, and education and training of the next-generation workforce.

Second, the Treasurys market must remain deep and credible. That requires strengthening investor confidence through predictable monetary and fiscal coordination and avoiding recurring debt-ceiling brinksmanship that unnerves global markets.

Third, the nation must embrace AI not as a disruptor, but as a tool for renewal. That means reskilling programs, focus on STEM education, and incentives for private sector innovation that ensure broad-based participation in the AI economy.

Finally, economic security must be seen as a pillar of national security. A strong dollar, a flexible workforce and a balanced fiscal framework are just as important to deterrence as aircraft carriers and missile shields.

The next five years may not bring a financial reckoning, but they will reveal whether the United States can adapt its fiscal habits, economic model and workforce to a rapidly changing technological and global landscape. Strategic foresight, not reactive crisis management, must define the next chapter of American leadership. We can do this.